Young Galaxies Have Surprisingly Strong Magnetic Fields: Contradicts Popular Theories
ScienceDaily (2008-07-26) -- The origin of magnetic fields in galaxies is still a mystery to astronomers. Popular theories suggest continual strengthening over billions of years. New research, however, contradicts this assumption and reveals that young galaxies also have strong magnetic fields. ... > read full article
Sunday, July 27, 2008
Thursday, July 24, 2008
Time for a Real Change--Time for Liberty
A video containing great persons: Martin Luther King Jr., Ayn Rand, Barry Goldwater, Ronald Reagan, Ron Paul, and current Libertarian presidential nominee: Bob Barr 2008 speaking about individual freedom and responsibility.
read more | digg story
read more | digg story
Sunday, July 20, 2008
War On Drugs: Harsh Jail Terms Make No Dent on Drug Trade
Absurd drug charges propelled by the "war on drugs" threatens many individuals and their personal liberties.
read more | digg story
read more | digg story
Thursday, July 17, 2008
Concerning the Council on Foreign Relations
I am disheartened to discover that the President of St. John's College for Santa Fe, NM campus was previously the Executive Vice President of the Council on Foreign Relations. Furthermore, President Michael Peters invited the current Executive President of the Council on Foreign Relations to the Commencement for the Class of 2007. This is especially disheartening because the idealism of young college graduates is easily misguided (I know this since I have experienced radical idealism).
A few things to consider about the Council on Foreign Relations:
The Council of Foreign Relations begin under the academic President of the USA, Woodrow Wilson, by a group of 150 scholars, then called the Inquiry. The Inquiry was the advisory committee to Wilson that developed the '14 point plan,' which was suppose to end future wars by creating an international government, the League of Nations.
Since the Council on Foreign Relations' creation, it has grown more powerful, politically, and its believe in the construction of a global government has dominated its philosophy:
"For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents, such as my encounter with Castro, to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure -- one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."
~David Rockefeller, Memoirs
Let's suppose that as allowed competition for product X decreases, the remaining monopoly acquires the complete share of the total market of product X. Then let's assume that governments grow competes in the same way, but as businesses compete for market share, governments compete for power. Therefore, a global government would mean a monopoly of power, or force.
Governments for the majority of history have been justified by the clergy, especially obvious in Despotism, but now governments must rely on the new religious order of the secular west--the infallible intellectuals.
A few things to consider about the Council on Foreign Relations:
The Council of Foreign Relations begin under the academic President of the USA, Woodrow Wilson, by a group of 150 scholars, then called the Inquiry. The Inquiry was the advisory committee to Wilson that developed the '14 point plan,' which was suppose to end future wars by creating an international government, the League of Nations.
Since the Council on Foreign Relations' creation, it has grown more powerful, politically, and its believe in the construction of a global government has dominated its philosophy:
"For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents, such as my encounter with Castro, to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure -- one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."
~David Rockefeller, Memoirs
Let's suppose that as allowed competition for product X decreases, the remaining monopoly acquires the complete share of the total market of product X. Then let's assume that governments grow competes in the same way, but as businesses compete for market share, governments compete for power. Therefore, a global government would mean a monopoly of power, or force.
Governments for the majority of history have been justified by the clergy, especially obvious in Despotism, but now governments must rely on the new religious order of the secular west--the infallible intellectuals.
1,000,000th Terrorist added to the Terrorist Watch List!
Jon Stewart covers this exciting new milestone of the War on Terror. We may have reached one million potential terrorists as deemed by the Bush administration, but unfortunately Nelson Mandela has been removed from the list in order to make room for the "real terrorists."
read more | digg story
read more | digg story
Great American Streetcar Scandal
There exists a pervasive rumor that General Motors and 'The Big Oil Corporations' are solely responsible for the collapse of the heavily-subsidized Streetcar businesses across the nation. This, however, is not true. The article here provides an unbiased account of the truth of the matter but forgets to mention FDR's Public Utility Act of 1935.
read more | digg story
read more | digg story
My Purpose for Blogging.
My mind has been muddled by the erroneous ideologies of time. Western Thought, as I know it, has never been classical, only and always new. Individuals have expressed themselves, classically, but society has failed to do this. Only individuals have embraced other individuals. There is no love between "societies," only quantifiable differences. That which is quantified are the individuals of a "society." Cosmopolitanism: Strangers are all the same, but known persons are unique relative to me.
Why Ego, then Logos?
Without Ego, I have no Logos. I strive to rationalize what is, as I experience it. The Logos of being allows you and I to communicate: that is my end (and hopefully it is yours, too).
Why Ego, then Logos?
Without Ego, I have no Logos. I strive to rationalize what is, as I experience it. The Logos of being allows you and I to communicate: that is my end (and hopefully it is yours, too).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)